LAST STAND

 

 

Home

About Us

Hot Topics

Calendar

Donations  

Join Us!

What's New?

Our Stands

Green Links

Home

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS
This letter to the editor of the Key West Citizen (September 2) explains Last Stand's reasons for challenging the state/county deal to increase development in the Keys before substantial progress is made on environmental commitments.
Affordable housing no excuse for degrading environment

The magnificent environment of the Florida Keys that sustains us all is in collapse.

Water quality, already critical, is getting worse. Polluted beaches plague our tourist economy, and the world-renown coral reef is becoming a pile of dead rocks. On shore, according to the $6 million Florida Keys Carrying Capacity Study, the remaining tropical hardwood hammocks and pinelands cannot survive any more development. Overpopulation of the low-lying Keys threatens human life, as well; already, residents cannot be safely evacuated under National Hurricane Center guidelines. The amount and type of development and tourism are ruining the very things that make the Keys the Keys.

In challenging the state's administrative rule to increase the growth rate in the Keys, Last Stand is living up to its name and its mission to protect the natural Keys and the quality of life for residents. For years, Monroe County has promised to take action to protect native forests and to clean up wastewater and storm water, but again and again has failed to meet the goals required by its comprehensive plan's work program and previous legal settlements with environmental groups.

For 20 years, the Keys have been designated an area of critical state concern because of their ecological importance and the rate of growth. Because of the link between development and environmental degradation, when the county fails to meet its work program goals, the state's rules require it to cut by 20 percent the number of permits that can be issued annually. This is designed to keep things from getting worse. Once again, in 2003, the governor and cabinet determined that the county had failed to make substantial progress on the previous year's work program. But, instead of cutting the number of permits, this administrative rule, in exchange for more promises, now proposes not only to increase the annual number of permits by 25 percent, but also to restore 165 units forfeited in previous years because of the lack of progress.

Last Stand supports the goals laid out in the state/county agreement to buy and protect environmentally sensitive land, to provide effective wastewater treatment and to increase affordable housing. We oppose only those portions of the administrative rule that would reward the county with increased development in advance of real compliance. Wastewater improvements should be fully operational before nutrient reduction requirements are removed, and no credits should be advanced for treatment improvements not yet accomplished.

Water quality, habitat and evacuation limits have all been exceeded. Instead of increasing the annual number of permits, we need to increase the ratio of affordable housing permits. Currently, a measly 20 percent of the permits are allocated for affordable housing, while 80 percent go to market rate housing. Affordable housing should get 80 percent of the annual permit allocation. For years, local and state governments have allowed conversions to transient housing, transferable ROGO exemptions and other practices that have actually reduced the existing affordable housing stock. And in the proposed administrative rule, the majority of annually allocated permits would still be for unaffordable homes.

Affordable housing impacts the environment just like other types of development and should not now be used as an excuse to increase development before the long-term protections are in place to ensure that the unique environment of the Florida Keys will be preserved for future generations.

Dennis Henize

Vice president, Last Stand

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS

RETURN TO HOME PAGE