LAST STAND

 

 

Home

About Us

Hot Topics

Calendar

Donations  

Join Us!

What's New?

Our Stands

Green Links

Home

Last Stand Opposes Filling of Salt Pond at Key West Airport

It's the filling of an 8-acre salt pond at Key West International Airport that Last Stand opposes.  We fully support the Runway Safety Area project at the east end of the runway, using Engineered Materials Arresting System (EMAS), but the filling of the "Duck Pond" at the west end is unacceptable.   From the May 9 Keynoter:

Last Stand objects to runway

By Alyson Crean acrean@keynoter.com


The Key West-based environment organization Last Stand has objected to proposed safety extensions at one end of Key West International Airport, saying the work would damage a delicate natural balance.

“We reject the extension of filled area at the west end of the runway into the Duck Pond,” the organization's board said in a statement issued last week.

As part of a four-year-old plan to extend safety overruns at the airport, composite materials would be added to each end of the runway to bring the unique island tarmac closer to Federal Aviation Administration standards.

Last Stand opposes the proposal for the west end of the runway that would fill part of a five-acre salt pond, reconfiguring it around the fill. The group says the delicate pond has a lower salinity than the rest of the surrounding salt ponds and provides rare habitat for migrating birds, an environment that could not easily be recreated in the more than 20 acres of planned mitigation.

Last Stand is not opposed to work on the other end of the runway.

“The east end is by far the most dangerous,” the board said in its official statement, “since 95 percent of the takeoffs and landings occur in that direction.”

Airport Director Peter Horton says specially designed, sloped gravel surfaces called Engineered Materials Arresting Systems would provide a safety margin using less space than traditional runway overruns.

Last Stand acknowledged the system would provide safety while minimizing the environmental impact.

The proposed extension is in the public review process, and Last Stand's objections are part of that review.

Overall, the project would run upward of $12 million, Horton said. Most of that will be paid by the FAA; passenger fees will pay the balance.

In its statement, Last Stand insists on more study if its objection is ignored.

“More study would be needed on the severe impacts of filling a salt pond and appropriate mitigation.”
 

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS

RETURN TO HOME PAGE