LAST STAND

 

 

Home

About Us

Hot Topics

Calendar

Donations  

Join Us!

What's New?

Our Stands

Green Links

Home

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS

IMPORTANT ACTION ALERT

Update February 22: The HARC meeting referred to in the article below has been changed to 2PM, Tuesday March 7

A very important special meeting of HARC has been called for Wednesday, February 22, at 3PM, Old City Hall in Key West.  As noted in the February 18 Key West Citizen article below, HARC Commissioner Don Craig says that the purpose of the meeting is not to "target" the 2.5 story rule, but to address "the definition of a story"... which is the main issue on which the Key West Bight neighborhood got the judges to agree with them regarding the Watermark project.  If that is not talking out both sides of the same mouth, we ask what is?!!  It's extremely important that concerned citizens turn out in numbers for this very important meeting Wednesday. 

HARC calls special meeting

CITIZEN STAFF

 

KEY WEST — The city's Historic Architectural Review Commission on Friday set a special meeting for this week to discuss possible changes to its design guidelines that govern construction and renovations in the city's historic district.

The two-hour meeting will be at 3 p.m. Wednesday in Old City Hall, 510 Greene St.

Board members Don Craig, Marilyn Wild and Terry Garcia on Friday asked Chairman George Born to set the meeting. Craig said its purpose is not to target the contentious 2.5-story height restriction that stymied the Watermark luxury condominium project.

"What we're talking about is changes to the design guidelines that cover a number of different issues," Craig said. "That includes terms of and the selection of members, length of effectiveness of HARC approvals, definition of a "story," plus clarification of other terms in the guidelines, and anything else that comes up."

News of the meeting had several Key West residents concerned, including City Commissioner Bill Verge, whose district includes part of the historic district and the Watermark project. He said it's obvious the meeting is an attempt to overturn the judge's ruling that blocked the Watermark project because its height would have exceeded 2.5 stories.

"They're trying to overturn Judge Payne's ruling and the Third District Court of Appeal's ruling, which is the whole basis for the Watermark decision," Verge said. "If you can't win in the judiciary, you try to win it through legislation."

The hotly debated Watermark luxury condominium project called into question the board's rule prohibiting buildings taller than 2.5 stories in the historic district. Neighbor groups opposed the project because it violated the board's guidelines. The board and the City Commission approved the project because it was in keeping with the city's rules, which allow buildings to be 35 feet high plus 5 feet for a pitched roof.

Judge Richard Payne overturned the city's approval of Watermark and a state appeals court refused to hear Watermark's appeal.

In January, City Attorney Bob Tischenkel asked Born to delay further discussion of the issue until the furor had died down.

"He's not allowed to do that," Craig said.

City code allows the board to recommend changes to its guidelines each year, and to call a meeting to do so, Craig said. 

 

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS

RETURN TO HOME PAGE