LAST STAND

 

 

Home

About Us

Hot Topics

Calendar

Donations  

Join Us!

What's New?

Our Stands

Green Links

Home

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS
This June 13 Key West Citizen editorial sums up the feelings of many, many people in the Keys.

Mainland development will affect the Keys

Last week, a parade of Keys citizens told members of the South Florida Regional Planning Council that a proposed development in south Miami-Dade County was a bad idea.

This proposal would place 6,000 homes, 300,000 square feet of retail space, 90,000 square feet of office space, a theater, two schools and a hotel at the southern end of the county, near where Card Sound Road meets U.S. 1.

The proposed land for this development is outside of Miami-Dade's 2005 urban development boundary and outside of the county's 2015 urban expansion area. Florida City also wants to annex the area and is pushing the county for permission to do so.

The Monroe County Commission and the Marathon and Islamorada councils have all publicly voiced their displeasure with this project, concerned with hurricane evacuation as well as the inequity in growth management standards applied to the Keys versus a piece of environmentally sensitive land just a few miles north.

The land in question also is in the footprint of an Everglades restoration project.

At the regional planning council meeting this week, two people — Monroe Planning Commissioner Lynn Mapes and 1000 Friends of Florida Executive Director Charles Pattison — made the same suggestion: The state should declare these lands an Area of Critical Concern.

Some regional planning councilors like the idea and directed their staff to research the issue and bring it back to them for action at their next meeting.

It has been many years since the state created a new Area of Critical Concern but this is an idea well worth pursuing. Certainly it is critical for the state to put the brakes on inappropriate development that is marching forward into lands that are needed for Everglades restoration projects.

Restoring the Everglades is, after all, the stated aim of an $8 billion plan that the U.S. and the state of Florida have made their highest environmental priority. It's quite a feat they're attempting, setting the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the South Florida Water Management District on the task of repairing an ecosystem destroyed by an intricate and extensive system of canals, levees and pumps.

At the same time, they're supposed to ensure water supply and flood protection for South Florida while coping with population projections expected to hit 20 million within our lifetimes.

In development-happy South Florida, it's no surprise to see projects proposed for lands that have already been outlined as necessary for restoration. The Florida City development currently under consideration is in the footprint of the Biscayne Bay Coastal Wetlands project, a component of Everglades restoration.

This isn't the first development proposed for land needed for Everglades restoration. The South Florida Water Management District already approved an earlier request in South Dade and is now considering a development in Martin County on land needed to help restore the Indian River Lagoon.

All this reveals a vast divide in the state's official attitude toward ecosystem restoration. On one hand, it touts its unprecedented commitment toward restoration and spends hundreds of millions buying land. It also devotes tremendous time, energy and money to buying land and improving water quality in the Florida Keys, the southern end of the ecosystem in question.

On the other, it allows development to plunge forward on lands essential to Everglades restoration and directly adjacent to the Florida Keys.

This is a double standard. The Keys have always been a place for state politicians, Republicans and Democrats alike, to collect environmental credits without political consequences. We have internationally significant resources but few voters to exact revenge for unpopular policies. This has, in general, worked for the protection of the Keys environment.

But if South Florida is truly a single region and restoring the ecosystem is truly the goal, the state's critical concern should not stop at the arbitrary border of the Monroe-Miami-Dade county line. Protecting the Keys and indeed providing for the sustainability of South Florida will require the political will to see the connections — including, if necessary, extending the Area of Critical Concern to mainland Miami-Dade.

 

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS

RETURN TO HOME PAGE