LAST STAND

 

 

Home

About Us

Hot Topics

Calendar

Donations  

Join Us!

What's New?

Our Stands

Green Links

Last Stand Blog

On March 31, Florida Department of Community Affairs rejected Monroe County's proposed "working waterfront" plan, based on several objections... described below in an article from the April 2 Keynoter.  May we say "I told you so" yet?
DCA again rejects county

By Alyson Crean acrean@keynoter.com
Waterfront law again has problems

The Florida Department of Community Affairs on Monday told Monroe County that parts of a proposed ordinance to preserve the working waterfront in the Keys does not comply with state statute.

The rejection came as no surprise to County Commissioner George Neugent.

“I felt this was going to happen,” he said. “This was the creation of a fatally flawed ordinance that was created through thoughtless actions of three county commissioners and one attorney.”

Neugent's harsh criticism comes from controversial changes to the ordinance, approved by commissioners Dixie Spehar, Mario Di Gennaro and Sonny McCoy, from last-minute suggestions by attorney Jerry Coleman, who represents Robbie's Marina on Stock Island.

The ordinance for unincorporated Monroe County moved from being one that would have protected the commercial fishing industry to a hot potato outlining the future development of only Stock Island.

This is the second time DCA has objected to the ordinance, which has taken the better part of two years to draft. In December, DCA issued objections to a first incarnation stemming from a lack of “data and analysis” for many of the policies in the ordinance.

One of the more controversial aspects has been the inclusion of the ability to build residential units and hotel rooms on waterfront property that has been zoned marine industrial.

The statement DCA issued this week says allowing construction of public lodging facilities is inconsistent with county policy that prohibits new transient residential units.

Some of the additions made by Coleman are specifically cited in DCA's objection. They include measuring building height from the base flood elevation, which could increase heights above the county's 35-foot restriction.

Coleman also added language that would have exempted a possible new hotel on the Stock Island waterfront from the county's rate-of-growth ordinance, which dictates the number of building permits issued.

DCA noted that “exempting development from the adopted allocation systems is internally inconsistent with the comprehensive plan because [county policy] prohibits new transient residential units including hotel and motel rooms....”

New Stock Island Properties, a group of developers, is looking to redevelop land adjacent to the island's deep-water port with docks, retail space, a hotel and a boardwalk connecting it all.

“I feel for the developers who got caught up unfairly in this situation,” Neugent said. “I'd like to see if there's anything we can do to work with DCA to move forward while truly protecting the working waterfront.”

Mediation might be the answer. According to the ruling, people affected can seek mediation by filing a request with the state's Division of Administrative Hearings.

“It's all a matter of negotiations now,” Di Gennaro said.

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS

RETURN TO HOME PAGE