LAST STAND

 

 

Home

About Us

Hot Topics

Calendar

Donations  

Join Us!

What's New?

Our Stands

Green Links

Last Stand Blog

Urgent Action Alert - December 3

 

Officials are poised to adopt - this week - an unrealistic and dangerous hurricane evacuation study in order to justify increased development in the Keys.

PLEASE URGE THE GOVERNOR AND CABINET TO REJECT THE 18.2 HOUR HURRICANE EVACUATION MODEL PROPOSED BY DCA.


WHAT TO DO:
  email NOW (or phone on Monday -- contact info below) asking the Governor and Cabinet members to:

- Reject DCAs’ finding the Florida Keys clearance time has instantaneously declined from 24 hours to 18.2 hours. Since such a paper-shuffle DOES NOT improve safety, but rather only facilitates massive growth. Subsequent evacuations will be less safe.

- Call for the required public review on all proposed changes in clearance times BEFORE accepting any such life-threatening assumptions.

- Ask for closer scrutiny of what constitutes “substantial progress” in Monroe County’s Annual Assessment. Substantial progress should mean much more than:
“50% complete”

PLEASE HELP NOW – the hearing is Tuesday, December 5, 2006


ACT NOW! CALL OR SEND YOUR E-MAIL TO:

Governor Jeb Bush
850-488-5152
flgov@myflorida.com

Attorney General Charlie Crist
850-245-0145
AG@oag.state.fl.us

Chief Financial Officer Tom Gallagher
850-413-2820
Tom.Gallagher@fldfs.com

Agriculture Commissioner Charles Bronson
850-410-6747
commissioner@doacs.state.fl.us

BACKGROUND INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN A FEW RECENT ARTICLES AND EDITORIALS  UNDER "HOT TOPICS". 
 

Some additional background:

- It is wrong for the Department of Community Affairs to report to the Commission that the evacuation time for the Florida Keys is 18.2 hours.

- Two years ago, the Department reported to the Commission that the Keys’ evacuation time was about to exceed 24 hours due to growth.

- Now, with zero increases to evacuation capacity having been made, but with pressure to allow significantly greater amounts of development, the Department is suggesting that the Commission should adopt 18.2 hours as the evacuation number for planning purposes in the Keys.


- This is not credible. Here are the facts:

1. The 2006 South Florida Regional Planning Council Regional Evacuation study recently modeled eight scenarios for the evacuation of the Keys. The resulting times range from 35.7 hours to 18.2 hours, depending on the scenario being analyzed. Under 6 of the 8 scenarios, the modeled evacuation time is over 24 hours. All are lacking substantial omissions of drive times, approaching an additional 5 hours!

2. The 18.2-hour hurricane evacuation policy framework approved for the Florida Keys had no public review or input.
 
3. The scenario under which the model shows an 18.2 hour evacuation time is based on the illogical assumption that all tourists and mobile home dwellers have already somehow evacuated – that they evacuated 48 hours PRIOR to the realization that a regional evacuation was needed.

4. The Department of Community Affairs has offered to issue as many as 3,500 work-force housing permits over the next two years, if the county achieves the goals of its state-mandated work plan, even though there is not a definition for workforce housing in the Monroe County Land Development Regulations and Comprehensive Plan.

5. The state’s decision to improve the “18 mile stretch” of US 1 between Florida City and Key Largo was premised on the assumption of a storm event that would precipitate a regional evacuation - a large, rapidly developing storm that intensified such that it was not possible to sequence evacuations in South Florida. Yet now, the Department of Community Affairs is assuming the opposite – the best case scenario - with the potential results being both an in appropriately increased rate and amount of development in the Keys and greater loss of life and property as a result of inadequate evacuation times.

6. These types of serious questions have been raised to the staff of the Regional Planning Council, which has pulled the study off its web page, and will be revisiting the study. Prior to the removal of the study, serious questions about the study's validity were raised and remain unanswered.

 RETURN TO HOME PAGE